In the News

Today, Rep. French Hill (AR-02) joined Face the Nation on CBS to discuss the importance of passing supplemental aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, as well as his REPO legislation that would take Russian sovereign assets and convert them to aid for Ukraine.

MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to get to some of the things that are coming up potentially for vote and for expiration. I know you sit on the Intelligence Committee and must be aware of not just this law enforcement bulletin warning of domestic terror threats, but also the concern of retaliation by Iran for a strike Israel recently conducted. A key surveillance tool, 702, will expire April 19. Are you confident Congress will authorize it in the coming days?

REP. HILL: I am confident that we will have support for renewing the authorization for the use of 702, which is a critical element I've seen in intimate detail the vital role that 702 surveillance plays and keeping America safe. I think Congress will come together and will reauthorize its use. But that's also going to be part of 50 reforms in how the FISA court, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, and how the act operates. And it'll be the first serious reforms in probably some 20 years and these are 50 bipartisan reforms and reforms that I believe have the full support of House Republicans.

MARGARET BRENNAN: And this will come up, I imagine, before we see any vote on Ukraine aid. Do you have any commitment from Speaker Johnson as to date, a timeline for moving aid that I know you support?

REP. HILL: Margaret, I believe that speaker Johnson will bring up support for the supplemental appropriations for Ukraine, for Taiwan, for Israel immediately after completing the work on FISA and FISA's extension. That deadline of April 19 makes it a priority for the first few days that we're back. But Ukraine remains a priority, as does our support for Israel, and Taiwan. And yes, I believe he's fully committed to bringing it up to the floor immediately thereafter. And I think that's critical as it should have been passed months ago.

MARGARET BRENNAN: You want to, as I understand it, make some changes, including attaching a provision that would allow for the U.S. to seize Russian sovereign assets and use them in the future to rebuild Ukraine. Any tweaks you make, doesn't it slow down the pathway for this to actually pass through the Senate and get to the Ukrainians who say they are running out of time?

REP. HILL: Well, the REPO Act that you're referencing, where we use Russian sovereign assets that are held in western European or US financial institutions, some $300 billion, would go a long way to filling the Ukrainian budget gap and be a good down payment for reconstruction, to make Putin pay the ultimate cost of his illegal invasion of Ukraine. It had a strong vote in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 20-2. A strong vote in the House Foreign Affairs Committee, 40 to 2. These are good votes and I think this provision would strengthen the package and the floor. I believe the House has support in both the House and Senate. And it would be, in my judgment, a way to get more support for the total package for Ukraine, seizing these Russian assets. And there is support in Europe for this. Prime Minister Sunak is supportive of this strategy, and others in Europe. 

MARGARET BRENNAN: There are some skeptics there as well, but I need to ask you because your Republican colleague, Marjorie Taylor Greene, as you know, filed this motion to vacate that would oust Speaker Johnson. She said if he puts Ukraine to a vote, and reauthorizes 702, the Republican base will go crazy. Do you agree and is the speaker at risk of being ousted if he does the things you say are essential?

REP. HILL: Well, I don't support- I don't- I don't share the view that Americans, including Republican voters, the belief that Putin should win in Ukraine. I think overwhelmingly Americans and Republican primary voters believe that Putin should be defeated in Ukraine. As I've said before, we should draw the line on authoritarian dictators, particularly permanent members of the Security Council invading neighboring countries. And I believe both Democratic, independent, and Republican voters support defeating Putin, backing Ukraine, and having a resolution here. It is not in America's economic, diplomatic or military interest for Putin to be successful in Europe or in the Far East.